
Response spectrum for the site of interest in Tehran in a 2475-year return period with and without considering rupture directivity effects
Figures of the Article
-
Distribution of the faults and the earthquakes after 1900 with magnitudes greater than 5 in the investigation region (IIEES)
-
Annual rate of occurrence estimated by Kijko (2000) method for Tehran and its vicinity
-
Comparison of the resulted hazard curves for PGA using in-house MATLAB code and SEISRISKIII software, while the Mosha fault is considered as the only source of seismicity
-
Comparison of a 2475-year return period response spectrum resulted in this study with response spectrum presented in Gholipour et al. (2008) final PSHA reports for Tehran
-
Response spectrum for the bedrock of considered site in a 10000-year return period
-
Deaggregation of hazard for the site of interest in Tehran in a 10000-year return period for different vibration periods, T
-
Variation of controlling magnitude with period for the site of interest in a 10000-year return period
-
Variation of controlling distance with period for the site of interest in a 10000-year return period
-
Variation of values for X with magnitude for the site of interest at the worst scenario for the location of hypocenter
-
Maximum probability of pulse occurrence at the site of interest in Tehran for earthquakes with different magnitudes on North Tehran fault
-
Hazard curves for the site of interest in Tehran in a 10000-year return period for different vibration periods, (a) T=0.1 s (b) T=1 s (c) T=2 s (d) T=4 s
-
Response spectrum for the site of interest in Tehran in a 2475-year return period with and without considering rupture directivity effects
-
Response spectrum for the site of interest in Tehran in a 10000-year return period with and without considering rupture directivity effects