
Citation: | Fan Yang, Qifeng Luo, Wei Che (2010). Torsional phenomena in 2008 great Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq Sci 23(1): 79-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11589-009-0077-3 |
The rotational damage phenomenon appeared in earthquakes is one of the research hotspots in earthquake engineering. In 2009 the journal of Bull Seism Soc Amer published a special issue on rotational seismology and engineering applications. Lee et al (2009) introduced 51 papers in the special issue and considered that rotational seismology is an emerging field for studying all aspects of rotational ground motions induced by earthquakes, explosions, and ambient vibrations. The rotational damage of structure is very complicated. At present, such kind phenomenon can be explained by eccentricity between the center of geometry and that of gravity, and/or rotational components of seismic motions.
Since the rotational components of seismic motions are difficult to be recorded, how to obtain rotational components, directly or indirectly, is one of the main problems. So far, four effective methods have been developed. The first is to study seismic rotational component based on focal mechanism and seismic wave propagation theory (Knopoff and Chen, 2009; Kulesh, 2009; Grekova et al, 2009). The second, which is based on elastic wave theory, is to calculate seismic rotational component by three seismic translation component records from a single seismographic station. The method regards asymmetric shearing strain as the main reason for seismic rotational effect. The second method can be further divided as traveling wave method (Newmark, 1969; Penzien and Watable, 1975; Hart et al, 1975; Tso and Hsu, 1978) and frequency domain method (Trifunac, 1982; Lee and Trifunac, 1985; Castellani and Boffi, 1986; Li, 1998). The traveling wave method assumes that seismic torsional component arising from traveling wave. Through the assumption, the method simplifies the displacement expression of seismic translation component and then finds a relation between seismic translation component and seismic torsional component. The frequency domain method maintains that seismic waves including rotational and translation components are composed of many simple harmonic waves with different frequencies. The method, based on elastic semispace theory, is to identify all relations between translation harmonic waves and rotation harmonic waves with the same frequency, and then the relation between seismic translational and rotational components can be given by Fourier inverse transformation. The third method is to calculate the seismic rotational component by seismic translation component records from dense arrays (Niazi, 1982; Oliveira and Bolt, 1989; Huang, 2003; Ghayamghamian and Nouri, 2007). The last method is to develop one new seismic detection systems to directly capture rotational components. Wassermann et al (2009) tested the performance of one commercial rotational motion sensor by comparing its output data which were performed during a demolition blast of a 50 m high building in the city of Munich (Germany) with the classical array-derived rotational motions. Fichtner and Igel (2009) analyzed sensitivity densities for two quantities, namely, the root mean square (RMS) amplitude and the apparent shear-wave speed, derived from rotational motion measurements.
This paper introduces the torsional phenomena that we observed on a zigzag bridge in Taibai park, Jiangyou city, Sichuan province, after the Wenchuan earthquake. In order to analyze that the torsional damage is caused by eccentricity of the structure or torsional component, one eccentricity model is established and equivalent rotational acceleration is calculated. And then the seismic rotational components are synthesized from the translational accelerations recorded at the Jiangyou seismic station. Finally, the comparison will show the main cause of the torsional damage occurred on the zigzag bridge in Jiangyou.
At 14:28 on May 12, 2008 (Beijing time), a great earthquake of MS8.0 occurred in Wenchuan, Sichuan, China. The focal depth is about 8 km and the intensity in epicentral area is up to Ⅺ. Jiangyou city is located in northwest hilly area of Sichuan, on the southeast of Longmenshan, and lies along the upper reaches of Peihe river. It is about 160 km far from Wenchuan county and only dozens of kilometers far from the BeichuanYingxiu fault. Jiangyou is one of the harder hit areas in the Wenchuan earthquake. When investigating in Taibai park, Jiangyou city, the authors detected that almost all the stone statues, which are placed upon the banisters of the zigzag bridge, exhibited different torsional displacements (Figures 1−3), with largest torsional displacement being up to 60°. This indicated that the torsional component might exist in the earthquake.
The zigzag bridge is a sight-seeing footbridge with eight bridge decks and reinforced concrete frames, and its master plan is shown in Figure 4. The bridge deck is divided into eight sections. Two end sections of the bridge are 6.5 m long and 3 m wide; each middle section is 8.5 m long and 3 m wide. The included angle between the two central axes of the adjacent sections is 120 . Totally there are 18 banisters in the joints of adjacent sections, which are 0.6 m long, 0.4 m wide and 1.2 m high; one 0.8 m high stone statue is placed upon each banister with cubical base being 0.1 m high. The length and width of each cubical base are a little different from each other. The sizes are shown in the second and the third rows in Table 1. A 0.6-m-high stone lantern is on each status.
![]() |
For convenience, following the direction of the arrows indicated in Figure 4, the stone statues along the left guardrail are numbered from 1 to 9 and the statues along the right are numbered from 1′ to 9′. The local coordinate system for each statue is different, x- and y-axis directions are shown in Figure 4. Its coordinate origin is located at a corner point of the statue base and the four corners are numbered from ① to ④, which is the same as No. 6 statue in Figure 4. The coordinate origin is assumed to locate at one of the four corners and it is the reference point for measuring. The first column of Table 1 shows all the numbers of the statues and their coordinate origins. Taking the number 6① in Table 1 as an example, '6' indicates the No. 6 statue and '①' indicates the number of the local coordinate origin. The included angle, from north to x-axis in a clockwise direction for each statue, is shown in the fourth row of Table 1.
As shown in Figure 5, the width and length of the rectangle statue base is separately b and l, the heights of the head part and tail part of the statue are h and h/2, respectively; the length of the head part is 2l/3 and that of the tail part is l/3. For installing the wire for the lantern located upon the statue, there is a cylinder hole in the statue with radius of 0.1l. The height of the head part is twice as tall as that of the tail; consequently, planar density of the head area of statue is 2ρ, where ρ is that of the tail area. There is a stone lantern on the top of the statue head (see Figure 3c), which is very heavy. Considering the change in planar density due to the fact that some of the stone lantern fell down in the earthquake, this paper will discuss two cases: with a stone lantern or without it. When there is stone lantern, planar density of the head area of statue is 3ρ. Otherwise, it is 2ρ. The eccentricity exits on the length direction, but no on the width direction. If the input acceleration along the width direction is a, the inertia torque, which results from eccentricity, is
|
(1) |
where τ is an variable of integration. The moment of inertia I of the statue is
|
(2) |
According to the inertia torque equivalence principle, equivalent torsional acceleration is
|
(3) |
where, u is the input acceleration in east-west direction, v the input acceleration in north-south direction and θ an included angle between width direction of the statue and the north-south direction. By equation (3) the equivalent torsional acceleration
Figures 6 and 7 show there is little difference in amplitude and in waveform of the equivalent torsional acceleration for different stone statue in the same case. The maximum equivalent torsional acceleration is about 10 rad/s2 in the case 1 and that in the case 2 is smaller, which is about 6 rad/s2.
Che and Luo (2010) synthesized the rotational ground motion using one station translational accelerations of the Jiji (Chi-Chi) earthquake. Here, we apply the same method to estimate the rotational component at Jiangyou station in Wenchuan earthquake. Three translational accelerations were recorded at Jiangyou station with the maximum acceleration of 5.11 m/s2 in the EW direction (Figure 8). It is assumed that the seismic ground motion is generated by plane harmonic waves arriving at the site. The direction of propagation of the seismic wave lies in the vertical (x, z) plane. The coordinate system is shown in Figure 9. It is supposed that the seismic waves propagate in a homogeneous isotropic elastic half-space or a layered elastic half-space, and the near-field seismic motion is produced by body waves. The relation between the Fourier spectrum of the rotational motion and that of the translational motion can be written as (Wang, 1995; Sun and Chen, 1998)
|
(4) |
where
The apparent velocity c(f) of the body waves is estimated by
|
(5) |
|
(6) |
where f is frequency in Hz, and ζ is a random number in (−1, 1).
The torsional acceleration is synthesized in terms of the translation records at Jiangyou station in Wenchuan earthquake (Figure 10). The maximum of the torsional acceleration is about 0.03 rad/s2. Comparing with the maximum equivalent torsional acceleration calculated in the section 3, the synthesized torsional component is very small, but it is consistent with that presented by Trifunac (2009), in which the rotations rang from 10-6 rad to 10-3 rad and accelerations from 10-4 rad/s2 to 10-1 rad/s2.
This paper firstly introduced the torsional phenomena appeared on the zigzag bridge in Taibai park in the 2008 great Wenchuan earthquake, which the authors found when making field investigation in Jiangyou, Sichuan province. There are two possible reasons to explain such kind of phenomenon, that is, it is caused by the eccentricity of the statues and the torsional component of ground motions.
For finding out the main reason to explain the torsional phenomena, considering the eccentricity of the stone statues, we calculated the equivalent accelerations of nine stone statues in two cases, that there is stone lantern locked upon the statue (case 1) or not (case 2). And then the torsional component is synthesized using the translational accelerations recorded at Jiangyou station. The calculated peak equivalent torsional acceleration is about 10 rad/s2 in the case 1 and 6 rad/s2 in the case 2, but the synthesized peak torsional acceleration is about 0.03 rad/s2. It is obvious that they are not in the same order of magnitude, from which it can be concluded that the torsional phenomena of the statues on the zigzag bridge is mainly affected by its eccentricity. Therefore, the anti-torque moment caused by structural eccentricity should be considered in seismic design.
The rotations and accelerations presented by Trifunac (2009) range separately from 10-6 rad to 10-3 rad and from 10-4 rad/s2 to 10-1 rad/s2. This paper indicates that the estimated torsional component at Jiangyou in Wenchuan earthquake and the results present by Trifunac are in the same order magnitude. And also the research implies that the torsional phenomena in earthquakes are very complicated, which were not only caused by the torsional motions. We should continue to collect more information and forward the research on rotational phenomena and rotational motions.
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50578125).
Castellani A and Boffi G (1986). Rotational components of the surface ground motion during an earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 14(7): 751-767 doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290140506
|
Che W and Luo Q (2010). Time-frequency response spectrum of rotational ground motion and its application. Earthquake Science 23(1): 71-77. doi: 10.1007/s11589-009-0078-2
|
Fichtner A and Igel H (2009). Sensitivity densities for rotational ground-motion measurements. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 1 302-1 314. doi: 10.1785/0120080064
|
Ghayamghamian M R and Nouri G R (2007). On the characteristics of ground motion rotational components using Chiba dense array data. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 36: 1 407-1 429. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
|
Grekova E F, Kulesh M A and Herman G C (2009). Waves in linear elastic media with microrotations. Part 2: Isotropic reduced crosserat model. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 1 423-1 428. doi: 10.1785/0120080154
|
Hart G C, Lew M and DiJulio R M (1975). Torsional response of high-rise buildings. J Struct Div 101(2): 397-416.
|
Huang B S (2003). Ground rotational motions of the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake as inferred from dense array observations. Geophys Res Lett 30(6): 1307-1310. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003GeoRL..30.1307H
|
Knopoff L and Chen Y T (2009). Single-couple component of far-field radiation from dynamical fractures. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 1 091-1 102. doi: 10.1785/0120080288
|
Kulesh M (2009). Waves in linear elastic media with microrotations. Part 1: Isotropic full crosserat model. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 1 416-1 422. doi: 10.1785/0120080152
|
Lee V W and Trifunac M D (1985). Torsional accelerograms. Int J Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 4(3): 132-139. doi: 10.1016/0261-7277(85)90007-5
|
Lee W H K, Celebi M, Todorovska M I and Igel H (2009). Introduction to the special issue on rotational seismology and engineering applications. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 945-957. doi: 10.1785/0120080344
|
Li H N (1998). Theoretical Analysis and Design of Structures to Multiple Earthquake Excitations. Science Press, Beijing, 22-31 (in Chinese).
|
Newmark N M (1969). Torsional in symmetrical buildings. Proceeding of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Chile, Jan. 13-18, 1969, 6: A3. 19-A3. 32.
|
Niazi M (1982). Inferred displacements, velocities and rotations of a long rigid foundation located at El Centro differential array site during the 1979, Imperial Valley, California earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 14(4): 531-542. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290140404
|
Oliveira C S and Bolt B A (1989). Rotational components of surface strong ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 18(4): 517-526. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
|
Penzien J and Watable W (1975). Characteristics of three-dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 13(4): 365-373.
|
Sun S J and Chen G X (1998). Synthesis method for estimation of rotation components of ground motion. Journal of Seismology (1): 19-24 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199800071706
|
Trifunac M D (1982). A note on rotational components of earthquake motions on ground surface for incident body waves. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 1(1): 11-19. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0261727782900092
|
Trifunac M D (2009). Review: Rotation in structural response. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 968-979. doi: 10.1785/0120080068
|
Tso W K and Hsu T I (1978). Torsional spectrum for earthquake motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 6(4): 375-382. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845
|
Wang J J (1995). The effects of torsional ground motion on thin cylindric shell structures. Aata Seismologica Sinica 8(2): 265-270. doi: 10.1007/BF02650490
|
Wassermann J, Lehndorfer S, Igel H and Schrelbeer U (2009). Performance test of a commercial rotational motions sensor. Bull Seism Soc Amer 99(2B): 1 449-1 456. doi: 10.1785/0120080157
|